Worked Examples of the Drinfeld Center

Detailed calculations and examples of Drinfeld centers for specific categories

Worked Examples of the Drinfeld Center#

Introduction#

In the previous chapter, we introduced the general concept of the Drinfeld center of a monoidal category. In this chapter, we'll work through explicit examples to demonstrate how to compute Drinfeld centers for specific categories. These concrete calculations will help develop intuition for this important categorical construction.

The Drinfeld Center of Vec(G)#

Definition of Vec(G)#

Definition2.1(G-Graded Vector Spaces)

For a group GG, the category Vec(G)\text{Vec}(G) consists of:

  • Objects: Vector spaces VV with a direct sum decomposition V=gGVgV = \bigoplus_{g \in G} V_g
  • Morphisms: Linear maps preserving the grading
  • Tensor product: (VW)h=g1g2=hVg1Wg2(V \otimes W)_h = \bigoplus_{g_1g_2=h} V_{g_1} \otimes W_{g_2}
  • Unit object: The base field kk, considered as concentrated in degree ee (the identity element of GG)
Remark

Vec(G)\text{Vec}(G) can be viewed as the category of representations of the group algebra kGkG, where the GG-grading corresponds to the weight decomposition under the action of GG.

Simple Objects in Vec(G)#

Proposition2.1

The simple objects in Vec(G)\text{Vec}(G) are one-dimensional vector spaces concentrated in a single degree gGg \in G.

Computing the Drinfeld Center Z(Vec(G))#

Now let's determine the structure of the Drinfeld center of Vec(G).

Theorem2.1

For a finite group GG, the Drinfeld center Z(Vec(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(G)) is equivalent to the category Rep(D(G))\text{Rep}(\mathcal{D}(G)) of representations of the Drinfeld double D(G)\mathcal{D}(G) of the group algebra kGkG.

To understand this, let's work directly with the definition of the Drinfeld center.

Example2.1(Computing Z(Vec(G)))

An object in Z(Vec(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(G)) is a pair (X,ϕ)(X, \phi) where:

  • XX is a GG-graded vector space, X=gGXgX = \bigoplus_{g \in G} X_g
  • ϕ\phi is a family of isomorphisms ϕY:XYYX\phi_Y: X \otimes Y \to Y \otimes X for each YY in Vec(G)\text{Vec}(G), satisfying the hexagon identity
Proposition2.2

For a simple object (X,ϕ)(X, \phi) in Z(Vec(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(G)) where XX is concentrated in a single degree gGg \in G, the element gg must be in the center Z(G)Z(G) of GG.

Theorem2.2

The simple objects in Z(Vec(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(G)) are in one-to-one correspondence with pairs (g,ρ)(g, \rho) where:

  • gg is an element of the center Z(G)Z(G) of the group
  • ρ\rho is an irreducible representation of the centralizer CG(g)C_G(g)
Example2.2(Z(Vec(Z₂)))

For G=Z2={0,1}G = \mathbb{Z}_2 = \{0, 1\}, the center Z(G)=GZ(G) = G since Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 is abelian. The centralizer CG(g)=GC_G(g) = G for all gGg \in G. Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 has two irreducible representations: the trivial representation (+)(+) and the sign representation ()(-).

Therefore, the simple objects in Z(Vec(Z2))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(\mathbb{Z}_2)) are:

  1. (0,+)(0, +): The trivial representation on degree 0
  2. (0,)(0, -): The sign representation on degree 0
  3. (1,+)(1, +): The trivial representation on degree 1
  4. (1,)(1, -): The sign representation on degree 1
Example2.3(Z(Vec(S₃)))

For the symmetric group S3S_3, the center Z(S3)={e}Z(S_3) = \{e\} (only the identity element). The centralizer CS3(e)=S3C_{S_3}(e) = S_3. S3S_3 has three irreducible representations: the trivial, sign, and 2-dimensional representations.

Therefore, the simple objects in Z(Vec(S3))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(S_3)) corresponding to the identity element are:

  1. (e,trivial)(e, \text{trivial})
  2. (e,sign)(e, \text{sign})
  3. (e,2-dim)(e, \text{2-dim})

Braiding in Z(Vec(G))#

Proposition2.3

For two simple objects (g,ρ)(g, \rho) and (h,σ)(h, \sigma) in Z(Vec(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(G)) with g,hZ(G)g, h \in Z(G), the braiding isomorphism:

c(g,ρ),(h,σ):(g,ρ)(h,σ)(h,σ)(g,ρ)c_{(g, \rho), (h, \sigma)}: (g, \rho) \otimes (h, \sigma) \to (h, \sigma) \otimes (g, \rho)

is given by the composition of the natural swap of tensor factors with the half-braiding ϕ\phi.

Example2.4(Braiding in Z(Vec(Z₂)))

For the simple objects in Z(Vec(Z2))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(\mathbb{Z}_2)), the braiding is determined by the group elements and the representations.

For instance, the braiding between (1,+)(1, +) and (1,)(1, -) introduces a sign, reflecting the representation structure.

The Drinfeld Center of Rep(G)#

Another important example is the Drinfeld center of Rep(G)\text{Rep}(G), the category of finite-dimensional representations of a finite group GG.

Definition of Rep(G)#

Definition2.2(Representation Category)

For a finite group GG, the category Rep(G)\text{Rep}(G) consists of:

  • Objects: Finite-dimensional vector spaces VV equipped with a group homomorphism ρ:GGL(V)\rho: G \to \text{GL}(V)
  • Morphisms: GG-equivariant linear maps
  • Tensor product: (VW,ρVW)(V \otimes W, \rho_{V \otimes W}) where ρVW(g)(vw)=ρV(g)(v)ρW(g)(w)\rho_{V \otimes W}(g)(v \otimes w) = \rho_V(g)(v) \otimes \rho_W(g)(w)
  • Unit object: The base field kk with the trivial GG-action

Structure of Z(Rep(G))#

Theorem2.3

The Drinfeld center Z(Rep(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Rep}(G)) is equivalent to the category of modules over the Drinfeld double D(G)\mathcal{D}(G), which can be described as:

Z(Rep(G))(c)Rep(CG(gc))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Rep}(G)) \cong \bigoplus_{(c)} \text{Rep}(\mathcal{C}_G(g_c))

where:

  • The sum is over conjugacy classes cc of GG
  • gcg_c is a representative of the conjugacy class cc
  • CG(gc)\mathcal{C}_G(g_c) is the centralizer of gcg_c in GG
Example2.5(Z(Rep(S₃)))

For the symmetric group S₃, there are 3 conjugacy classes:

  1. Identity: {e}\{e\} with centralizer S3S_3
  2. Transpositions: {(12),(13),(23)}\{(12), (13), (23)\} with centralizer Z2\mathbb{Z}_2
  3. 3-cycles: {(123),(132)}\{(123), (132)\} with centralizer Z3\mathbb{Z}_3

Therefore, Z(Rep(S3))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Rep}(S_3)) has:

  • 3 simple objects from Rep(S3)\text{Rep}(S_3) (conjugacy class of identity)
  • 2 simple objects from Rep(Z2)\text{Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_2) (conjugacy class of transpositions)
  • 3 simple objects from Rep(Z3)\text{Rep}(\mathbb{Z}_3) (conjugacy class of 3-cycles)

For a total of 8 simple objects.

Exercise2.1

Verify that the number of simple objects in Z(Rep(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Rep}(G)) equals the number of pairs (c,ρ)(c, \rho) where cc is a conjugacy class of GG and ρ\rho is an irreducible representation of the centralizer CG(gc)\mathcal{C}_G(g_c).

Beyond Group Examples#

The Drinfeld Center of TY(sl₂)#

A more advanced example comes from the representation theory of quantum groups.

Definition2.3(Temperley-Lieb Category)

The Temperley-Lieb category TL(q)\text{TL}(q) for qCq \in \mathbb{C}^* is a monoidal category where:

  • Objects are natural numbers
  • Morphisms are C\mathbb{C}-linear combinations of planar diagrams
  • Tensor product is addition of natural numbers
  • Each loop in a diagram contributes a factor of q+q1q + q^{-1}
Remark

For qq a root of unity, the semisimplification of the representation category of Uq(sl2)U_q(\text{sl}_2) is related to the Temperley-Lieb category TL(q)\text{TL}(q).

Example2.6(Z(TY(sl₂)))

The Drinfeld center of the Temperley-Lieb category at a root of unity has a rich structure related to conformal field theory, specifically the SU(2) Wess-Zumino-Witten model.

The simple objects correspond to "anyons" in physics, particles with exotic exchange statistics.

Computational Methods#

Categorical Reconstruction#

Proposition2.4

For a factorizable finite tensor category CC, the Drinfeld center Z(C)\mathcal{Z}(C) can be reconstructed from the Grothendieck ring of CC and its S-matrix.

Example2.7(Reconstruction Formula)

For a modular tensor category with simple objects {Xi}\{X_i\} and S-matrix entries sijs_{ij}, the characters of simple objects in the Drinfeld center can be expressed using the Verlinde formula.

Exercise2.2

Apply the reconstruction method to compute the fusion rules in Z(Vec(Z3))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(\mathbb{Z}_3)).

Applications of These Examples#

Remark

These concrete examples of Drinfeld centers have applications in:

  • Topological quantum computation (Z(Vec(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(G)) for abelian GG)
  • Quantum invariants of 3-manifolds (Z(Rep(G))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Rep}(G)))
  • Conformal field theory (Z(TY(sl2))\mathcal{Z}(\text{TY}(\text{sl}_2)))
Example2.8(Kitaev's Toric Code)

Kitaev's toric code for quantum error correction can be understood in terms of the Drinfeld center Z(Vec(Z2))\mathcal{Z}(\text{Vec}(\mathbb{Z}_2)). The anyonic excitations in this model correspond to the four simple objects we identified earlier.

In the next chapter, we'll explore the connection between Drinfeld centers and topological quantum field theories, revealing how these categorical constructions encode physical phenomena.